******************************************************************************

ICEB RELATED JOURNAL

******************************************************************************

NOTE:  Please save the form with the file name as 
"JJJJ-xxxx-nnn-Review-yyyy.doc", 
where "JJJJ" is the journal name, "xxxx" is 
the 4-digit Paper ID, "nnn" is the 
round of review (i.e., 1st, 2nd, 3rd), and 
"yyyy" is the 4-digit Reviewer ID.  
For example: "IJEB-1234-2nd-Review-0678".  
After completion, please e-mail the 
form to the editor; please do not send the 
form in hard copy.  
Thank you very much for your cooperation.


******************************************************************************


*********  REVIEW FORM



Paper ID#:________________
 
Paper Title:____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
 
Reviewer ID#:________________    Review Round#:___________________
 
Date sent: (Please enter the date indicated in the e-mail):______________________
 
Date due: (Please enter the date indicated in the e-mail):______________________    
 
 
PLEASE EVALUATE THE MANUSCRIPT BASED ON THE FOLLOWING SCALE:
1 = Poor
2 = Below average
3 = Average
4 = Good
5 = Excellent
x = N/a = Not applicable
 
_____ A. This paper is based on rigorous academic standards.
 
_____ B. This paper is presented in a format which is accessible by practitioners. It focuses on justification, results and implementation; has readable style; technical material is in appendix.
 
_____ C. The paper has clarity of presentation.  It is well organised, clearly written.
 
_____ D. The paper makes a significant contribution to the body of knowledge related to this Journal.  It is highly significant, breaks new ground, and provides a foundation for future research.
 
_____ E. The topic of this paper is relevant, timely, and of interest to the audience of this journal.
 
_____ F. The rationale for the paper is well grounded.  It is based on a known theory or on an interesting issue.
 
_____ G. The research methodology for the study is appropriate and applied properly.
 
_____ H. The content of this paper is technically accurate and sound.
 
_____ I. The supporting evidence in this paper is strongly reliable and properly validated.
 
_____ J. Discussion of the results is based on analysis of data; results aren't overstated or overgeneralized
 
_____ K. Implications and recommendations for management are relevant and useful.  
  
_____ L. The paper is easy to read and free from grammatical or spelling errors.  
 
 
M. What is your recommendation?
______ Clear reject
______ Reconsider after major revisions
______ Accept with minor revisions
______ Accept as is

 
N. What is the publication PRIORITY? (Please check one) 
______ Publish immediately
______ Give high priority
______ Give medium priority
______ No rush
 
O.  Does this paper need a professional editing assistance?  ____ Yes    ____ No
 
P.  Does this paper contain graphics of which the resolution needs to be improved? ___ Yes  ___ No

Q.  Does this paper cite any related work published in this journal?  ____ Yes    ____ No
 
R. Comments for the author:  (Please present specific details using the 
following categories.)
 
SUMMARY:
 
 
 
STRENGTHES:
 
 
 
MINOR WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS:
 
 
 
MAJOR WEAKNESSES AND SUGGESTIONS: